US Strikes on Nigeria Signal ‘Deeply Troubling Precedent’ for Governance Across Africa
When the United States carried out airstrikes in northern Nigeria in late December, it said the operation—conducted at Abuja’s request—targeted Islamic State fighters to prevent the killing of Christians. However, experts have challenged Washington’s narrative that Christians are being systematically massacred in Nigeria, arguing that the claim, widely promoted by the American right, oversimplifies the country’s complex security and communal conflicts. Analyst Prince Charles Dickson, speaking to RFI, described the US intervention as a “warning sign” for Nigerians, cautioning that it sets a troubling precedent for external involvement in Africa’s internal governance and security affairs. Dickson is a Nigerian policy analyst and serves as the team lead at the community-focused peacebuilding organization, Tattaaunawa Roundtable Initiative (TRICentre). RFI: Did Abuja really ask for the strikes? Prince Charles Dickson: Officially, yes. Both US Africa Command and Nigerian authorities have stated that the strikes were conducted “in coordination with, and at the request of” the Nigerian government, specifically targeting ISIS-linked cells in Sokoto. However, within Nigeria, it doesn’t feel like a fully sovereign, carefully considered decision. There was no transparent public discussion, no prior briefing for citizens or… US Strikes on Nigeria Signal ‘Deeply Troubling Precedent’ for Governance Across Africa



































